![]() ![]() ![]() HASP's AES encryption is a true 128-bit version of the standard.Ģ. This MCU has no separate code protection fuses and its code protection flags are incorporated as an ordinary bits in the user flash memory, so erasing them optically would eventually ease the whole flash memory of the chip. It's motorola/freescale MCU is more mature compared to that of the SHK. HASP is more mature key and has been available (to hackers also) for almost 6 years. On my opinion HASP SRM is better (HL is firmware updated to SRM as you probably know so it would be wiser to compare HASP SRM to SHK) because:ġ. Your research is meaningless unless you are working for safenet and now you are deciding which solution should be phased out I would throw away both solutions Or I would have looked for a firmware modification of the keys that makes them execute a hidden user defined code (I mean the part of the user software itself) in the dongles themselves. Soon there will be a single key with common drivers & SDK. ![]() Your question is somehow obsolete since both keys (HASP & SHK) are owned by the same company - Safenet. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |